65th Annual Conference

 

Thursday, February 21

Morning Open Sessions

10:00 A.M.-1:15P.M.

 

Session 303

Power and Change in Group Systems: Positive and Negative Outcomes

 

Presented in cooperation with the International Association of Group Psychotherapy and Group Process
 

Chair:         

Fern Cramer Azima, Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Associate Professor, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

 

Panelists:         

Bonnie Buchele, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, DFAGPA, Director, Greater Kansas City Psychoanalytic Institute, Leawood, Kansas
Francis Bonds-White, Ed.D, Private Practice, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Jeffrey Kleinberg, Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, New York, New York
Isaiah Zimmerman, Ph.D., FAGPA, Washington School of Psychiatry, Washington, DC
 

Power and Change affect all group systems for better or worse. The panel members will explicate therapy groups, group organizations, institutional and governmental systems. Examples will be given of the, power of culture in the process of change in therapy groups; the activation of sibling rivalry and competition in group organizations ; the promotion of pathogenic group defenses and paranoia that may result in university and corporate entities; the role of leadership, subgrouping and conflict dynamics that may result in unexpected and less desired outcomes in these various group systems.

 

Learning Objectives: 

The attendee will be able to:

1. Define the concepts of power and change in groups.
2. Analyze effective as compared to detrimental intervention strategies.
3. Improve leadership skills in various organizational settings.
 

Course References:

1. Deutsch, M. & Coleman,P.T.( 2000) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Kernberg, O. (1998). Ideology, Conflict and Leadership in Groups and Organizations. New Haven: Yale, 1998.
3. Nitsun, M.(1996) The Concept of the Anti-Group, New York: Routledge.

4. Pearce, C.L. &  Sims, H.P. (2002) Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of effectiveness of change management teams. Group Dynamics, 6, 172-197.