|
52nd
ANNUAL INSTITUTE
Two Special
Institute Presentations
Monday,
February 18, 9:00 A.M.-5:00 P.M.
Online registration is now closed - please register onsite
The Impact of "Thinking Systems" Rather than "Thinking People"
on Group Psychotherapy
Instructor:
Yvonne M. Agazarian, Ed.D., CGP,
DFAGPA
The goal of the presentation is to
explore the impact of “thinking systems” rather than “thinking
people” on the approach to group psychotherapy. There will be two
contrasting demonstration groups. First, a Foundation Group of
members, new to the Systems-Centered approach, will demonstrate
the development of a secure group system through applying the SCT
method of functional subgrouping. Second, experienced SCT members
will demonstrate the effect of using a range of SCT skills on the
group experience. Principles of functional subgrouping, undoing
system role-locks and weakening restraining forces to system
development, will be introduced and discussed in small groups.
Dr. Yvonne Agazarian is a
psychologist, a consulting affiliate to the Friends Hospital,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the founder of the Systems-Centered
Training Institute. She teaches, trains and supervises
Systems-Centered therapists internationally, and has a private
practice in Philadelphia. She co-authored
The Visible and
Invisible Group and wrote
Systems-Centered Therapy
for Groups. Dr. Agazarian is a Distinguished Fellow of AGPA,
a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and received the
Group Psychologist of the Year award from the American Psychological
Association "for her involvement in research, publication, teaching
and training."
How People Create One Another in Groups
- Instructor:
-
Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D., ABPP
People’s sense of reality is
constructed in interconnection with those who make up their social
world. Together we create the reality that we live in. We have in
mind certain “characters” that we need in our world and find people
who seem to live out those characteristics. Others in turn find in
us "characters" that fit in the reality they aim to
construct, and together we shape a script or play that we will live
in together.
Processes of illusion (transitional
object usage) and creating the other (projective identification) are
ubiquitous in groups – and in life. People are often confused by how
others see them, often frustrated by how others treat them, seldom
aware of their own role in creating the others who live on their own
private stage or the roles they enact for others in their interior
dramas. In this didactic and experiential presentation, we will
examine how this happens, how we are each creating one another.
Dr. Ruthellen Josselson is
currently a member of the faculty of The Fielding Institute in
Santa Barbara, California and previously taught psychology at The Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, Harvard University, and Towson State
University in Maryland. She is the recipient of the Henry A.
Murray Award from the American Psychological Association and a
Fulbright Fellowship. Dr. Josselson is the author of
Revising Herself: The Story of Women's Identity from College to
Midlife, a longitudinal study of women's growth based on
intensive interviews, and
The Space Between Us: Exploring
the Dimensions of Human Relationships, a phenomenological
study of how people connect with one another over a life time. Her
most recent book, with Terri Apter,
Best Friends: The Pleasures
and Perils of Girls' and Women's Friendships, sheds light on the
unique characteristics of female interaction and its implications
for relationships.
Continuing Education for Special Institute Presentation:
5.5 credits/.55 units
Two-Day Institute Sections
Tuesday &
Wednesday, February 19-20
Online registration is now closed - please register onsite
INSTITUTE OPENING SESSION
Tuesday,
February 19, 8:30-9:15 A.M.
If Not Now, When?
Take Some Risks
Jerome S.
Gans, M.D., CGP, FAGPA
At the AGPA
Annual Meeting, attendees report that it is during their Institute experience that they learn experientially about group
dynamics, make meaningful connections with other people, and
experience a sense of personal renewal. In this unique environment,
Institute participants have the opportunity to learn about
themselves not only through their interactions with others but also
through their willingness to take some risks. The positive feelings
that Institute participants take away from their experience are
often proportionate to the risks that they felt able to take. Such
risk taking does not happen every year for every participant, but
who knows, maybe this will be your year!
Dr.
Jerome Gans is a Fellow of the American Group Psychotherapy
Association, a Distinguished Life Fellow of the American
Psychiatric Association, and an Associate Clinical Professor of
Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. He is presently a member of
AGPA’s Board of Directors and serves as Editor of The Group
Circle. Dr. Gans has served as Co-Chair of the Annual
Meeting and Co-Chair of the Institute of AGPA as well as
the Book Review Editor of the International Journal of Group
Psychotherapy. Dr. Gans has authored 16 publications in the
Journal over the last 19 years on a variety of topics.
He has run T-groups for psychiatric residents for 25 years. Dr.
Gans has a private practice in Wellesley and Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
The Institute
is primarily designed for clinical professionals who meet the
requirements of a Master’s degree in a mental health profession
and who have clinical psychotherapy experience. Many sections of
the Institute welcome psychiatric residents, graduate students in
mental health degree programs and mental health workers who work
in a range of human service settings. Please register for a
section consistent with your experience.
The Institute
is scheduled over two full days: Tuesday, February 19, 9:30 A.M. –
5:30 P.M. and Wednesday, February 20, 8:30 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.
Registration will only be accepted for the full two-days and
registrants will be expected to attend both days, including the
Opening Session. Continuing Education credit will not be awarded
for partial attendance. Devoted to small group teaching, these two-day groups
are led by experienced instructors and are formed according to participants'
levels of experience. The Institute consists of two sections:
-
Process Group
Experience (PGE) Sections:
These
small groups provide participants an environment to obtain, expand
and retain their skills in conducting group therapy. The PGE
sections are divided into three levels, giving participants an
opportunity to work with peers who have similar levels of
experience and in one of the groups to work with professionals
with a range of experience. The PGE sections are conducted by many of the
country's outstanding group therapists. The group psychotherapy
skills gained are important in conducting any group, regardless of
its theoretical orientation, time parameter or patient
population. PGE sections are essential training and benefits
the participants, both personally and professionally. A portion of each PGE will be
didactic. A maximum of twelve registrants
will be accepted per group.
- Specific
Interest Sections:
Intensive
learning that explores a variety of theories and methods in group
treatment is offered in these limited registration groups.
Registrants will pursue current interests in greater depth or
learn ways of integrating new approaches and methods into their
private practice, clinic or agency work. Many of the Specific
Interest Sections have experiential components.
Registration maximum (up to 20 registrants) has been set by each
instructor.
Continuing Education for Two-Day Institute Sections: 12.5 credits/1.25 units
EVALUATION, RESEARCH AND OBSERVATION:
Institute sections will be observed by Institute Subcommittee
members. Some events have been selected for research projects
approved and conducted under the auspices of the Association.
In addition all registrants will be asked to complete
questionnaires, designed to aid us in continuing to provide high
quality meetings, upon conclusion of their attendance at events.
The last few minutes of each event will be utilized for
completion of questionnaires.
PROCESS GROUP
EXPERIENCE (PGE) SECTIONS
I-A. GENERAL
PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE
Entry Level
Less than 4 years of group psychotherapy experience
- Instructors:
-
1.
Cindy Miller Aron, M.S.W., CGP, Mental Health Specialist,
Samaritan Health Physicians, Corvalis, Oregon
-
2.
John Caffaro, Ph.D.,
Professor,
California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles,
California
-
3. Molly
Walsh Donovan, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Washington, DC
-
4.
Joan Medway, Ph.D., LCSW, BCD, CGP,
Private Practice,
Potomac, Maryland
- 5.
Robert Evans Schulte, M.S.W., CGP,
Private Practice, Alexandria, Virginia
- 6. Etta
Martin, M.S.W., CGP, FAGPA,
Private Practice, Portland,
Oregon
-
- Intermediate
Level
4-9 years of group psychotherapy experience
-
- Instructors:
-
7.
Shoshana Ben-Noam Psy.D., CGP, Private Practice, New York,
New York
-
8. Scott
Simon Fehr, Psy.D., CGP,
Graduate Faculty, Nova Southeastern
University Center for Psychological Studies, Fort Lauderdale,
Florida
-
9. Louisa
Powell Livingston, Ph.D., CGP, Faculty, Supervisor, Postgraduate
Center for Mental Health Group Department, New York, New York
-
10. Judith Schaer,
LCSW, M.S.W., CGP, Co-Director, Long Island Center for
Group Training, Long Island, New York
-
11. Carol A. Vaughan
LCSW, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Houston, Texas
Advanced Level
10+ years of group psychotherapy experience
Instructors:
12.
David M. Hawkins M.D., CGP, DFAGPA, Private Practice, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina
13.
Barbara Keezell, LICSW, CGP, Private Practice, Brookline,
Massachusetts
14. Joseph C. Kobos,
Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Director, Counseling Service;
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center,
San Antonio, Texas
15. Emily
E. Lape, LCSW, FAGPA, Staff Clinical Social Worker,
Supervisor, Group Therapy Coordinator, Eating Disorders Specialist,
University of Virginia Center for Counseling & Psychological
Services, Charlottesville, Virginia
16. Rosemary
Segalla Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Washington, DC
17. Walter
Evans Smith, M.Div., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Atlanta,
Georgia
I-B.
PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE SECTION WITH MIXED LEVELS OF EXPERIENCE
Instructors:
1.
Elaine Jean Cooper, M.S.W., Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Clinical
Professor, University of California School of Medicine at San
Francisco, San
Francisco, California
2. Norman
A. Neiberg,
Ph.D., CGP, DFAGPA,
Private Practice,
Newton Centre, Massachusetts
I-C. PROCESS GROUP EXPERIENCE SECTION FOR SENIOR THERAPISTS
Limited to prior AGPA Institute instructors or registrants who have participated in
four or more AGPA Institutes.
Instructors:
1.
Phyllis Mervis, D.S.W., LCSW, Clinical Instructor,
Department of Psychiatry, Mount
Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
2.
Melvin J. Stern, M.D., CGP, FAGPA, Clinical Professor of
Psychiatry, George Washington University School of Medicine,
Washington, DC
I-D. TWO-YEAR CONTINUOUS SECTION
Registration for this section assumes attendance at two consecutive Annual Meetings.
Instructors:
1.
Bruce
Bernstein, Ph. D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, New
York, New York
(This is the 2nd
year of this 2-year section; New participants will not
be accepted.)
I-E. THREE-YEAR CONTINUOUS SECTION
Registration for this section assumes attendance at three consecutive Annual Meetings.
Instructors:
I-F.
NATIONAL INSTRUCTOR-DESIGNATE SECTION
Registration for this section is by invitation only.
Instructor:
Beatrice
Liebenberg, M.S.W., CGP, DFAGPA,
Private
Practice, Washington, DC
Process Group Experience Sections – Course References:-
Aveline, M.O. (1993). Principles of Leadership in Brief Training Groups for Mental Health Care Professionals. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 43:107-129.
- Gans, J.S., and Alonso, A. (1998). Difficult Patients: Their Construction in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48:311-326.
- Ganzarain, R. (1989).
The Group as a Training Base. In R. Ganzarain Object Relations and Group
Psychotherapy. (pp. 217-337). New York: International Universities Press.
- Horwitz, L. (1977). A Group Centered Approach to Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27:423-439.
- Kauff, P.F. (1979). Diversity in Analytic Group Psychotherapy: The Relationship between Theoretical Concepts and Technique. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 29:51-56.
- Kibel, H.D., and Stein, A. (1981). The Group-as-a-Whole Approach: An Appraisal. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31:409-427.
- MacKenzie, K.R., Dies, R.R., Coche, E., Rutan, J.S., and Stone, W.N. (1987). An Analysis of AGPA Institute Groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37:55-74.
- Pines, M. (1981). The Frame of Reference of Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31:275 285.
- Rutan, J.S., Alonso, A., and Groves, J.E. (1988). Understanding Defenses in Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38:459-472.
- Rutan, J.S., and Stone, W.N. (1984).
Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy. New York: MacMillan., Press.
- Swiller, H.I., Lang, E.A., and Halperin, D.A. (1993).
Process Groups for Training Psychiatric Residents. In A. Alonso
and H.I. Swiller (Eds.). Group Therapy in Clinical Practice, (pp. 533-545). Washington
DC: American Psychiatric Press.
- Wong, N. (1983). Fundamental Psychoanalytic Concepts: Past and Present Understanding of
their Applicability to Group Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33:171-191.
- Yalom, I.D. and Lieberman, M.A. (1971). A Study of Encounter Group Casualties. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25:16-30.
SPECIFIC
INTEREST SECTIONS
Section II
Age-Related Transference/Countertransference
in Group
Instructors:
Beryce MacLennan, Ph.D., DBCP, CGP, DFAGPA,
Faculty, Center for Psychotherapies for the Elderly, Washington School of
Psychiatry, Washington, DC
George M. Saiger, M.D., CGP, FAGPA,
Faculty, Center for Study of
Psychotherapies for the Aging, Washington School of Psychiatry, Washington, DC
This experiential
section addresses the changes in self concept, image, tasks and status which
group therapists experience as they grow older. The objectives are to sharpen
group therapists' awareness of their own and others reactions to age/sex related
issues and to increase their capacity to manage such transference/countertransference
phenomena in groups.
Learning Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1.
Understand how they are aging.
2. Learn how age affects their therapy.
3. Examine how therapist and patients react to age and their
expectations.
4. Examine their own reactions to handicaps, illness and dying.
Course References:
1.
Saiger, G. Group Psychotherapy with Older Adults. Psychiatry,
64(2) 2001.
2. Leszcz, M. Integrated Group Psychotherapy for the Treatment
of Depression in the Elderly. Group, 21(2) 1997.
3. MacLennan, B. Group Psychotherapy for Elderly Patients. In
A. Alonso and H. Swiller, eds. Group Psychotherapy in Clinical
Practice. American Psychiatric Press, 1993.
Section III
The Art of Culture Building in
the Group: An Experiential Journey
Instructors:
Barbara Ilfeld,
MSN, RNCS, CGP, Private Practice, Olympic Valley, California
Frederic Ilfeld Jr., M.D., Clinical Professor of
Psychiatry, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada
Utilizing the
experiential group process, didactic presentation, and open
discussion, the leaders will 1) clarify the concept and mechanism of
the group’s “culture” as a paramount therapeutic factor, 2)
highlight those cultural elements (shared norms and values) that
maximize therapeutic movement, and 3) illustrate techniques for
promulgating these therapeutic norms and values.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Describe the
manner in which cultural norms and values influence the group
process.
2. Identify those specific norms and values that best contribute to
therapeutic change.
3. Utilize specific therapist techniques that help therapeutic norms
and values evolve, thereby contributing to individual change within
the group.
Course References:
1. Greene, L.R.
(2003). The State of Group Psychotherapy Process Research.
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 53, 130-134.
2. Leszcz, M. (1992). The Interpersonal Approach to Group
Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42,
37-62.
3. Yalom, I.D. and Leszcz, M. (2005).
The Theory and Practice of
Group Psychotherapy. 5th ed. New York: Basic Books.
Section IV
The Critical Voice: Its Power to
Unite or Divide our Groups!
Instructor:
Gregory J.
MacColl, LCSW, CGP, Private Practice, Manhattan/Forest
Hills, New York
All groups
experience the pivotal moment when members become critical of others
or the leader. This "charged" atmosphere has the potential to shut
down connections or electrify the group. The leader's ability to
"stand by" the critic, while balancing the group's expression of
its own discomfit, is of critical importance!
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Identify
strategies to unblock expression of critical voice.
2. Analyze how
members defend against critical expression.
3. Demonstrate how
the leader can accept criticism to role-model for the members.
Course References:
1. Gans, J. &
Alonso, A. (1998) Difficult patients: Their Construction in Group
Psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 48, 311-326.
2. Yalom, I (1985).
The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.
New York: Basic Books.
3. Ormont, L. (1993). "Resolving resistances to immediacy in group
settings. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 43, 399-418.
Section V
The Dynamic Interplay of Combined
Therapy
Instructor:
Haim Weinberg,
Ph.D., CGP, Senior Tutor, Professional School of Psychology,
Sacramento, California
In combined
therapy the patient is treated by the same therapist both in the
group and individually. This format allows the exploration of both the intrapsychic and the
interpersonal, and encompasses the individual in all aspects. It
enables the therapist to see the person as a whole, including inner
and outer realities. In this section we will explore the pros and
cons of combined therapy, its potential benefits and risks, specific countertransference themes, ethical questions and
counter-indications. The structure of the section involves process
group sessions interspersed with individual sessions. There
will be a didactic portion at the end of the section.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Specify the
pros and cons of combined therapy.
2. Identify countertransference reactions in combined therapy.
3. Define when combined therapy is not recommended.
Course References:
1. Alonso, A., &
Rutan, (1990). Common Dilemmas in Combined Individual and Group
Treatment. Group, 14(1), 5-12.
2. Caligor, J., Fieldsteel, N.D., & Brok, A.J. (1993).
Combining
Individual and Group Therapy. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson.
3. Weinberg H. & Ditroi A. (2007). Concurrent Therapy, Countertransference, and the Analytic Third. Group, 31(1).
Section
VI
Fostering Regression: The
Omnipotent Child Takes Center Stage
Instructor:
Stewart Aledort,
M.D., CGP,
Clinical Faculty, Washington Psychoanalytic
Society,
Washington, DC
This section
will demonstrate, over time, the four major developmental phases of
group psychoanalysis that the group and leader must negotiate to
organize around an effective, durable analytic culture. The
psycho-sexual phase, along with its narcissistic and object related
conflicts will be experienced. This model can be applied to once
weekly groups.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Identify and
list the characteristics of the omnipotent child.
2. Identify the power of the passion in the group.
3. Identify the organization through the passion of the bad fit.
Course References:
1. Aledort, S.
(2002). The Omnipotent Child Syndrome: The role of passionately held
bad fits in the formation of identity. International Journal of
Group Psychotherapy, 52, 67-89.
2. Aledort,
S. (2003). Fleshing out the Omnipotent Child In Group Psychotherapy.
Group, 27, 151-169.
3.
Mahler, M. (1968).
On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. New
York: International University Press.
Section VII
Functional Role-Taking: Beyond
Survival to Developing and Thriving in Organizations
Presented in
cooperation with the Systems-Centered
Training and
Research Institute
Instructor:
Susan Gantt,
Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Director,
Systems-Centered Training and Research Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
Systems-centered training enables a
shift from taking one's work roles personally to working them
functionally in support of the goals of the context. Applicable to
all those take or are interested in taking leadership roles
including local society leadership, this section will build a
systems-centered context in which to explore the challenges of role
flexibility and functional role-taking. Priority enrollment will
be given to Affiliate Society Leaders.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Discriminate
between functional organizational roles and the ongoing personal
role suction to nonfunctional roles.
2. Apply
systems-centered thinking to learn to locate oneself in role related
to the goal of the context.
3. Identify how to
increase one’s capacity for role flexibility.
Course References:
1. Agazarian, Y.,
and Philibossian, B. (1998). A Theory of Living Human Systems as an
Approach to Leadership of the Future with Examples of How it Works.
In E. Klein, F. Gabelnick & P. Herr (Eds.),
The Psychodynamics of Leadership. Madison, CT: Psychosocial
Press.
2.
Gantt, S. and Agazarian, Y. (2006).
SCT in Action. London: Karnac.
3.
Carter, F. (2000).
Relationships as a Function of Context. In U. McCluskey and C.
Hooper (Eds.),
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Abuse: The Cost of Fear. London
and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Section
VIII
Group Psychotherapy and
Attachment Theory
Instructor:
Philip J.
Flores, Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Atlanta,
Georgia
This section will
experientially demonstrate the ways that attachment theory furnishes
an effective theoretical formula for informing the delivery of group
treatment. Particular attention will be paid to the process of
attachment and the inevitable rupture, repair, and reunion that
occurs in all healthy, functional, and authentic relationships.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Describe the
ways that attachment theory can be applied to group psychotherapy.
2. Define the different styles of attachment (Avoidant, Ambivalent,
Disorganized, & Secure) and their relationship to group.
3. Identify the ways that secure base and exploration are
intricately connected.
Course References:
1. Lewis, T.,
Amini, F., & Landon, R. (2000).
A general theory of love. New York:
Random House.
2. Flores, P. J. (2004).
Addiction as an attachment disorder.
Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Press.
3. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G. Jurist, E.L. & Target, M. (2002).
Affect
Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Self. New York:
Other Press.
Section
IX
Hope and Dread: The Disruptive
Power of Love and the Erotic in Group Psychotherapy
Instructor:
Allan Elfant,
Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, State College, Pennsylvania
The inevitable and
enlivening occurrence of love, passion, and sexuality in our
psychotherapy groups creates possibilities for personal
transformation. However, the experiences of these charged themes
also pose risks and dilemmas for the group, its members, and group
leaders. Through an experiential format, we will explore these
delicate and sensitive issues.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Discuss the
complicated group tensions that occur when issues of love and the
erotic are engaged.
2. Appraise the risks and benefits of experiencing and expressing
desire and love in group psychotherapy.
3. Identify and explain the constructive as well as harmful impact
of group leader countertransference issues that arise when love and
erotic feelings are voiced in our groups.
Course
References:
1. Mann, David.
(1999).
Psychotherapy: An Erotic Relationship: Transference and Countertransference Passions. New
York: Penguin Books.
2. Nitsun, Morris. (2006).
The Group as an Object of Desire:
Exploring Sexuality in Group Therapy. New York: Routledge.
3. Person, Ethel. (1988).
Dreams of Loving and Fateful Encounters: The
Power of Romantic Passion. New York: Penguin Books.
Section X
Integrating Spirituality,
Meditation and Group Therapy
Instructor:
Kenneth Porter,
M.D., CGP, FAGPA, President, Association for Spirituality and
Psychotherapy, New York, New York
The members of
this section will experience spiritually-oriented group process
and learn an innovative paradigm of therapeutic philosophy, self,
healing and technique. Much time will be spent in
spiritually-oriented group process, with time also in meditation
with instruction, spiritual exercises and theoretical discussion.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Practice
awareness meditation.
2. Identify the essentials of spiritually-oriented psychotherapy.
3. Integrate meditation into clinical practice.
Course References:
1. Porter, K.
(2004). Who We Really Are: Buddhist Approaches to Psychotherapy and
Group Psychotherapy. Group, 28(4).
2. Schermer, V. (2003).
Spirit and Psyche. London: Jessica Kingsley.
3. Welwood, J. (2000).
Toward a Psychology of Awakening. Boston: Shambhala.
Section XI
Integrative Relational Group
Therapy
Instructor:
Michael J. Stiers, Ph.D., CGP,
Executive
Director,
Washington
School of Psychiatry, Washington, DC
Contemporary
group psychotherapy is informed by a variety of relational theories,
including interpersonal, object relations and intersubjective
approaches. This experiential section will use these theoretical
approaches as interchangeable lenses to facilitate the group's
development. The feasibility of integrative approaches will be
discussed by making use of the member's experience.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will be able to:
1. Apply
relational approaches to group therapy.
2. Discuss the
feasibility of considering different theoretical approaches as
interchangeable lenses that can be used to facilitate the group at
various stages of development.
3. Compare the
role of the relational group facilitator with the role of the
leader-centered group facilitator.
Course References:
1. Billow, R.M.
(2003).
Relational Group Therapy: From Basic Assumptions to Passion.
London: Jessica Kingsley.
2. Green, Z., and
Stiers, M. J. (2002). Multiculturalism and Group Therapy in the
United States: A Social Constructionist Perspective. Group, 26,
233-246.
3. Wright, F.
(2004). Being moved, seen, disrupted and reconfigured: Group
Leadership from a Relational Perspective. International Journal of
Group Psychotherapy, 54, 235-250.
Section XII
The Leader's Self-Psychological
Stance on Group Formation
Instructor:
Walter N.
Stone, M.D., CGP, DFAGPA, Professor Emeritus, University of
Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
This experiential
section will examine the impact of application of self
psychological and intersubjective principles to members' experience
of group formation and process. The impact of a leader's consistent
empathic stance and contribution to the developing process will be
explored as applied to the self needs of the participants and to
group goals and ideals.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Appreciate the
impact of an empathic stance on group formation and development.
2. Identify the need for types of selfobject response.
3. Distinguish traditional and self psychological vies of
anger/aggression/assertion.
4. Describe the impact of the leader's stance of understanding and
explaining.
5. Assess the impact of a focus on leading and trailing edge
phenomenon.
Course References:
1. Stone, W.
(2001). The Role of the Therapist's Affect in the Detection of
Empathic Failures, Misunderstandings and Injury. Group, 25, 3-14.
2. Rutan, J.S., Stone, W.N., & Shay J. (2007).
Psychodynamic Group
Psychotherapy. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press
3. Tolpin, M. (2002). Doing psychoanalysis of normal development:
Forward edge transferences. In A. Goldberg (ed), Postmodern Self
Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology. 18, 167-190.
Section
XIII
Managing Love and Hate Groups
Instructor:
Ronnie Levine,
Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Faculty, Center for the Advancement of
Group Studies, New York, New York
This section is designed to help
therapists understand and work comfortably with loving and angry
feelings in the group and within themselves. This workshop will help
participants to identify the indicators of disguised feelings, to
control destructive aggression and to transform anger into its
creative potential for therapeutic growth.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Identify the
fears and blocks that interfere with having one's thoughts and
feelings
2. Identify the individual and group manifestations of love and
hate.
3. Formulate interventions that address emotional communication and
the needs of the group.
Course References:
1. Levine, R.
(2007). Treating Idealized Hope and Hopelessness. International
Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57(3), 297-319.
2. Ormont, L. (1984). The Leader's Role in Dealing with Aggression
in Group. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 34(4),
353-372.
3. Ormont, L.
(1988). The Leader's Role in Resolving Resistances to Intimacy in
the Group Setting. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38,
29-45.
Section
XIV
A Modern Analytic Approach to
Working with Immediacy
Instructor:
Elliot Zeisel,
Ph.D., LCSW, CGP, FAGPA, Faculty, Training Analyst, Center
for Modern Psychoanalytic Studies, New York, New York
Working in the
Here-and-Now provides us with a picture of interpersonal experience
and a window into the patient's and leader's intrapsychic process.
We will explore use of various interventions in the resolution of
resistance and examine methods for enhancing the leader's ability
to use countertransference reactions to overcome obstacles in himself
and in group members.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Describe the
role of resistance analysis in group process.
2. Define the role
of objective countertransference in formulating interventions.
3. Define the role
of the insulation barrier in dealing with aggression in group
process.
Course References:
1. Ormont, L. R.
Use of Group in Resolving Subjective Countertransference.
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 41: 433- 448.
2. Maroda, K. (1991).
The Power of Countertransference: Ch. 2
"Motivations for Treatment: The Pursuit of Transformation.
England: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
3. Spotnitz, H. (1976).
Psychotherapy of PreOedipal Conditions. Ch.
31. "Training in the Use of Feelings" New York: Jason Aronson.
Section XV
Passion, Pain and Hope in
Professional Life
Instructor:
Earl Hopper,
Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, London, England
It is necessary
and desirable for therapists to understand their social
psychological wounds in private practice and professional
organizations, which have changed dramatically and traumatically.
Envy, jealousy, competition, rivalry, success, failure, envy
pre-emption, secrets, shame, guilt, disappointments...challenge us
all. Unresolved transference and countertransference processes need
continuing work.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Analyze the
ways in which they have contributed to their own frustrations and
disappointments in their professional lives.
2. Distinguish between self-destructive and helpful forms of envy
pre-emption.
3. Discuss the transformation of "innocence" and "zeal" into mature
hopefulness in professional activities and clinical work.
4. Acknowledge their own senses of shame and guilt in connection
with their imperfections in clinical work and organizational
citizenship.
Course References:
1. Brown, D. G.
(1998). Fair shares and mutual concern: the role of sibling
relationships, Group Analysis, 31, 3: 315-326. In
Resonance and
Reciprocity: Selected Papers by Dennis Brown edited by Jason Maratos.
London: Routledge.
2. Hopper, E. (2003).
Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of
Groups. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
3. Navaro, L. and Schwartzberg, S. (2007). (eds)
Envy, Competition
and Gender: Theory, Clinical Applications and Group Work. London: Routledge.
Section XVI
Passion and Power in Groups: The
Interplay Between Envy, Competition and Intimacy
Instructors:
Leyla Navaro,
M.A.,
Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey
Steven Van
Wagoner, Ph.D., CGP,
Private Practice,
Washington, DC
This section will
illustrate how men and women struggle with intimacy in groups,
including through competition, avoidance or mutual sharing and
enjoyment. Group members often cope with vacillating experiences of
inclusion and exclusion that arouse feelings of
attraction and identification, but also frustration and envy which
can threaten destruction in the group. Through the leaders'
containment of these powerful experiences,
participants will analyze ways of constructing intimacy and
competing for relatedness as well as identifying and verbalizing
feelings of envy, rejection and perceived loss of power as a way of
neutralizing its destructive potential.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Identify the
impact of passionately held feelings of envy and competitiveness on
group cohesion, especially those that go unexpressed verbally.
2. Critically
evaluate both individual and gender differences in exercising or
avoiding power and competition.
3. Distinguish
between healthy and destructive aspects of exercising or avoiding
power and competition.
4. Distinguish
between power-over issues versus mutuality and power-with issues.
5. Identify ways
in which jealousy and envy emerge in competition as they elicit
experiences of inclusion and exclusion.
6. Construct ways
in which to illuminate and work with gender differences in envy and
competition.
Course References:
1. Maguire, M.
(2004).
Men, Women, Passion and Power. Gender Issues in
Psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Routledge.
2. Doherty, P. et
al. (1996). Competition in Women: From Prohibition to Triumph. In
Women and Group Psychotherapy: Theory and Practice (ed. DeChant, B.)
New York: The Guilford Press.
3. Navaro, L.
(2007). On Being Envied. In L. Navaro & Schwartzberg, S. L. (Eds.)
Contemporary Perspectives on Jealousy, Envy, Competition and Gender.
London: Brunner/Routledge.
4. Van Wagoner, S.
L. (2007). Men and Competition: Whither the New Man? In L. Navaro &
Schwartzberg, S.L. (Eds.)
Contemporary Perspectives on Jealousy,
Envy, Competition and Gender. London: Brunner/Routledge.
Section
XVII
Power, Passion and Politics:
Examining Gender Relationships in Group
Instructors:
Hylene S.
Dublin, M.S.W., LCSW, BCD, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice,
Winnetka, Illinois
Darryl Pure,
Ph.D., ABPP, CGP, FAGPA, Private Practice, Chicago, Illinois
Men and women
often approach issues from differing perspectives. This section
will expose participants to a model of single gender groups with the
opportunity to experience and examine the dissimilarities between
genders. Subsequently, the groups will be combined providing an
opportunity to experience the impact and the capacity for bridging
differences.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Explain the
research and theory regarding men’s and women’s behavior in single
gendered groups.
2. Compare the research and theory regarding men’s and women’s
behavior in combined gender groups to that of single gender groups.
3. Distinguish the similarities and differences in the functioning
of men and women in single gendered groups.
4. Discuss the impact on group participation of combining men and
women in groups.
Course References:
1. Andronico, M.
(Ed.) (1996).
Men in Groups: Insights, Interventions, and Psychoeducational Work. Washington: American Psychological
Association.
2. Alonso, A. and Rutan, J.S. (1979). Women in Group Therapy. International Journal
of
Group Psychotherapy, 29: 187.
3. DeChant, Betsy (ed.) (1996).
Women and Group Psychotherapy:
Theory and Practice. New York: Guilford.
4.Dublin, H.
(2007). The Evolution of the Female Self: Attachment,
Identification, Individuation, Competition, Collaboration, and
Mentoring. In Navaro, L. & Schwartzberg, S. (Eds.).
Envy,
competition and gender: Theory, clinical applications and group
work. London: Routledge, pp. 59-78.
Section
XVIII
Redecision Therapy: Model
Short-Term Treatment Approach
Instructor:
Michael Andronico,
Ph.D., CGP, FAGPA,
Private Practice, Somerset, New Jersey
Redecision Therapy
is an integration of Gestalt, Transaction Analysis, imagery, and
behavior modification conceived by Mary and Bob Goulding. This
section will demonstrate how these approaches can be blended
with regressive work in an experiential group process setting.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Formulate a
therapy contract.
2. Learn and apply the concept of the chronological elevator.
3. Learn how non-verbal behaviors can facilitate regressive work.
Course References:
1. Goulding, M.
and Goulding, R. (1979).
Changing Lives Through Redecision Therapy.
New York. Grove Press.
2.
Gladfelter, J. Redecision
Therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42(4).
3.
Andronico, M. The
Chronological Elevator: A Redecision Model for TA and non TA
Therapists. In
Redecision Therapy: Expanded Perspectives,
L. Kadis. (Ed.). 1985, Western Institute for Group and Family Therapy.
Section
XIX
Shaken, Rattled and Rolled:
Preserving the Emotional Health of the Group Leader
Instructor:
Janice M.
Morris, Ph.D., CGP, Private Practice, Austin, Texas
As group leaders,
we are faced with the challenge of tolerating toxic and painful
feelings while functioning as competent therapists and maintaining
emotional health. This Modern Analytic group provides experiential
and didactic learning that: 1) promotes productive use of subjective
and objective countertransference in clinical work, 2) identifies
forms of countertransference resistance that inhibit the leader’s
effectiveness and, 3) provides a framework for reducing the suffering
and anxiety of the group leader.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Distinguish
between objective and subjective countertransference.
2. Describe three types of countertransference resistance.
3. Integrate objective countertransference with group interventions.
4. Identify four ways the experience of being a group member
enhances the emotional health of the group leader.
Course References:
1. Epstein, L.
(1983). The Therapeutic Function of Hate in the Countertransference.
In L. Epstein and A. Feiner (Eds.), Countertransference: The
Therapist’s Contribution to the Therapeutic Situation. 213-234. New
York: Jason Aronson.
2. Ormont, L. (1992). Subjective Countertransference in the Group
Setting: The Modern Analytic Experience. In L. Furgeri (Ed.),
The
Technique of Group Treatment: The Collected Papers of Louis R. Ormont, Ph.D. 207-217. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
3. Spotnitz, H. (1987). Affect Training of Analytic Group
Therapists. In
Psychotherapy of Preoedipal Conditions. 347-353.
Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Section
XX
Symbol, Story and Psyche: A
Jungian Approach to Group Psychotherapy
Instructor:
Justin Hecht, Ph.D.,
Clinical Faculty, University of California, San Francisco, San
Francisco, California
This section will approach group
from a Jungian perspective. The leader will use a symbolic approach
to facilitate appreciation of the dynamic unconscious and the
influence of archetypes. We will attend to paradox, transference,
individuation, and the problem of the opposites. A didactic
presentation will conclude the section.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Apply a Jungian
orientation to group psychotherapy interventions.
2. Identify archetypal material in group settings.
3. Utilize a Jungian approach to the transference to facilitate
individuation.
Course References:
1. Whitmont,
Edward C. (1964). Group Therapy and Analytical Psychology. Journal of
Analytical Psychology.
2. Willeford, William. (1967). Group Psychotherapy and Symbol
Formation. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 12, 137-160.
3. Zinkin, Louis. (1989). The Group’s Search for Wholeness: A Jungian
Perspective. Group, 13, 252-264.
Section
XXI
Two-Year Process Group with
Intermediate Conference Call Meetings
Presented in cooperation with the
National Registry of
Certified Group Psychotherapists
Instructors:
Gil Spielberg, M.S.W., Ph.D., CGP,
FAGPA, Training and Supervising Analyst, Institute for
Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Los Angeles, California
Robert Unger, M.S.W., Ph.D., CGP,
FAGPA, Faculty, Leadership Team, Naropa University, Boulder,
Colorado
This is an
experimental process designed to explore the combination of
face-to-face meetings with meetings in the telephone conference
format. We will meet as a two-year general process group at the
2008 and 2009 Annual Meetings with three telephone conference call
sessions between the two Annual Meetings. Participants will be
required to commit to the two-year onsite Institutes as well as two
of the three telephone conference call meetings. These meetings
will take place at 8:30 (EST) Sunday evenings on May 18, August 17,
and November 16, 2008. Specific instructions for engaging in the
conference calls will be presented at the 2008 meeting.
Learning
Objectives:
The attendee will
be able to:
1. Practice skills
development for group psychotherapy.
2. Identify specific intervention techniques employed by the
leaders.
3. Develop skills necessary to work both as a leader and member in
distance learning situations.
4. Assess the relative merits of working face-to-face and in
conferencing formats.
|